INSIGHTS

Proof of origin is now part of the sale: what US forced-labor enforcement means for European textile and home brands

Illustration of folded fabric bolts and a cotton branch with an origin document tag, in espresso and ochre tones

The first meeting with an American buyer used to open with price, lead times and minimums. Lately it opens with a different question: where does your cotton come from? Not the country on the label. The farm, the spinner, the mill, the dye house. Brands that treat this as a compliance chore are reading it wrong. In the US market, proof of origin has become a sales document, and the brands that have it ready are the ones getting second meetings.

The legal core is the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Under the UFLPA, any good mined, produced or manufactured wholly or in part in Xinjiang, or by an entity on the UFLPA Entity List, is presumed to be made with forced labor and barred from import into the United States under Section 307 of the Tariff Act. The presumption can be rebutted, but the bar is high: the importer must show clear and convincing evidence that no forced labor touched the product. Note who carries that burden. It is the US importer of record, usually your buyer, who must produce the file. If the paperwork does not convince US Customs and Border Protection, the shipment is detained at the port, and CBP publishes its enforcement statistics on a public dashboard. When a buyer asks for your supply chain before placing an order, this is what they are protecting themselves from.

It is also no longer only about Xinjiang. In June 2026, CBP issued new Withhold Release Orders against garments made in Jordan by two factories, Needle Craft Ltd. and Casual Wear Apparel LLC, and against copper products made in Serbia by Serbia Zijin Copper D.O.O. Officers at every US port now detain those shipments. Jordan is a major garment-sourcing hub. The lesson for a European bedding or towel brand is uncomfortable but simple: a shipment can be stopped over a link in the chain you never visited, in a country you do not buy from directly, because your spinner or your dye house did.

This summer added a cost angle. On July 23, the Office of the US Trade Representative closed out Section 301 investigations into 60 economies for failing to ban forced-labor imports the way the US does, and imposed new tariffs of 10 or 12.5 percent. Most imports from the European Union fall in that range, net of the normal MFN rate, unless the product is exempted. The EU has its own forced-labour ban on paper, but it does not apply until December 2027, and Washington is not waiting. Forced labor now shows up twice in your landed cost: the risk of a detained shipment, and a tariff line tied directly to how your home jurisdiction polices its own imports.

Europe is building the same machinery in the other direction. Under the EU Forced Labour Regulation, from December 14, 2027, no product made with forced labour may be sold in or exported from the EU, and companies under investigation will be asked to show how they manage forced-labour risk in their supply chains. The Commission has already published its guidelines, a risk database and traceability tools. The same supplier map your US buyer asks for today will help you answer questions at home. The EU ban requires a result, not this particular file: traceability is evidence, not a prescribed checklist.

So build the file before the first meeting, not after the first detention. Fiber origin, spinner, weaver or knitter, dye house, cut-and-sew, with the certificates to back each step. A brand that hands that over in the meeting looks like a safe line to carry. A brand that promises to get back to the buyer gets compared to the one that had it on the table. If you want the full legal picture, KPMG's TradeWatch webcast on September 29 covers the UFLPA, the Section 301 action and the EU regulation in one session.

Aegis Club is based in New York and covers the entire USA. For European home and lifestyle brands, we prepare the commercial side of US entry: the buyers, the channel, the pricing, and the documentation buyers now expect to see before they commit.

Sources: US Customs and Border Protection, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act; Office of the US Trade Representative, “USTR Takes Action in Forced Labor Section 301 Investigations,” July 23, 2026, and accompanying Fact Sheet; European Commission, Forced Labour Single Portal and Regulation (EU) 2024/3015, with Commission guidelines on due diligence and traceability; KPMG, “Navigating Global Forced Labor Enforcement: US Section 301, UFLPA, and EU Regulations,” TradeWatch webcast, September 29, 2026

← Back to all insights