US tariffs: the Tapestry and Ralph Lauren test

This week's clearest signal on US tariffs and American demand came from the earnings calendar. On Thursday, Tapestry and Ralph Lauren both reported results for the quarter ended September 26, both beat expectations, and both raised their full-year outlooks. For a European brand weighing the US market, the detail inside those numbers is worth more than the headline, and it is a signal, not a verdict.

What did the numbers actually show?

Tapestry, the group behind Coach and Kate Spade, grew net sales 11 per cent on a reported basis to $1.89 billion, and 12 per cent on a pro forma basis that excludes the Stuart Weitzman business it sold last year. Coach grew 16 per cent. Kate Spade fell 10. [1] Ralph Lauren, itself a luxury house, grew revenue 9 per cent reported and 10 per cent in constant currency, to $2.2 billion: Asia up 28 per cent, North America up 6, Europe up 1. [3] Both companies raised full-year guidance, and both beat the estimates analysts had penciled in. [7][9]

One honest caveat belongs in the same paragraph. Ralph Lauren's third-quarter guidance, 3 to 4 per cent constant-currency growth, landed below what analysts expected, and its shares fell on the day. [8] Beat and raise describes the year, not every quarter.

Did the European luxury slowdown cross the Atlantic?

Not into these two income statements. The third quarter was hard at the big European houses, the re-set we covered in The re-set does not stop at the border: LVMH's fashion and leather goods division shrank even as the group grew overall, and Kering slipped 1 per cent on a comparable basis, with Chinese demand the weak spot for both. [5][6]

The American groups showed the opposite, and in the same geography. Ralph Lauren's Asia revenue rose 28 per cent; Tapestry's Greater China revenue rose 39 per cent on a pro forma basis. [1][3] The market the European houses blame for the slowdown delivered growth for both Americans.

What these results show is brand-level variation: strength at Coach and Ralph Lauren, a decline at Kate Spade, a hard quarter at the biggest European houses. Two earnings reports cannot settle the state of wider American demand. What they do say is that buyers are still spending at some labels, and not at every label at every price.

How are US tariffs showing up in the numbers?

Tariffs are now visible inside the figures, on the cost side and the recovery side. Tapestry's non-GAAP gross margin expansion included a net benefit from tariffs and duties worth about 70 basis points, and its quarterly filing records a $13 million benefit to operating income from tariff refunds and related interest. [1][2] The backstory matters: Tapestry paid about $117 million of duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Supreme Court ruled those duties invalid in February, and the company collected substantially all of the cash this quarter. [2]

Ralph Lauren went further. It recognized an $82.3 million benefit from refunds of IEEPA duties it had paid - refunds its filing describes as received in the quarter, without stating the exact cash amount. The filing credits the benefit with about half of the 620-basis-point reported gross-margin expansion, and Ralph Lauren directed $33.2 million of the refunds to charitable donations. [3][4] Both companies are transparent about the accounting. Ralph Lauren excludes the refunds from its adjusted results, where gross margin still expanded 250 basis points, and from its forward guidance. [3] Tapestry booked most of its recovery in the prior quarter and collected the cash in this one. [2]

Refund money is real money. It is also one-off: it recovers past duty costs; it does not lower today's duty rate.

What this means for European brands

Three lessons travel across the Atlantic.

Price for the regime you have. Both companies treat duties as a cost to engineer around, not a storm to wait out. Tuesday's midterm result changes no duty rate, as we set out in US tariffs after the midterms.

Check whether you are owed a refund. The courts have directed CBP to refund previously collected IEEPA duties, and both companies' filings describe a phased claims process for qualifying entries. [2][4] Whether any specific entry qualifies is a check for the importer of record and their customs broker, not a rule that every refund follows an identical path. If your US customer was the importer of record, their side would file, and the contract can decide who keeps the money. The CAPE mechanics and timelines are in the same piece.

Stop waiting for the American consumer to rescue a price that does not work. What made demand hold at these two houses, the filings do not say; as a planning interpretation, assume the price must be earned through product, pricing and distribution, not inherited from the market. Where duties squeeze a price that already works, weigh the tariff hedge options, including US production, with clear eyes: When Made in USA is the tariff hedge.

Reading earnings season, duty schedules and refund windows is part of what the desk does. If you want your US pricing checked against the current tariff regime, request access.

Sources

Primary (reported financials):

Analyst-consensus coverage (for "beat expectations", not for reported financials):

Clothing boutique interior in New York. Photo: Pexels.

← Back to all insights

What did the numbers actually show?

Did the European luxury slowdown cross the Atlantic?

How are US tariffs showing up in the numbers?

What this means for European brands

Sources

Related